Skip to main content

3 Week Film Making Task: Evaluation



Upon setting out to film we found our first challenge – time, availability and organisation. It was very difficult to find time to film when everyone was free, in order to overcome this we had to film the actors individually, and improvise when people simply couldn’t be present at filming – this even meant using a ‘stunt double’ and ‘hand model’ to stand in for actors in certain scenes. Overall I think that we worked well to improvise and work with the little time that we had. Another issue with our filming was that some of the shots that we chose to film ‘hand held’ appeared to be more unstable than anticipated, even with stability mode switched on the camera. Next time in order to combat this I would film less zoomed in and then crop the frame down to the desired focus in editing. As well as this we found it very difficult to successfully film a tracking shot of the actress walking forwards, this came across strongly in our final production and in future I would consider using a ‘dolly’ for the tripod in order to capture these shots.  

When it came to the editing process there were also a few problems that we faced. The most frustrating probably was the way the software would ‘glitch out’ causing clips to disappear off the track – erasing at times a whole hour’s worth of work. In order to resolve this problem we spent our lunchtimes and free periods in the classroom making up for lost time, and regularly saving and checking our track. In future it would be worth leaving ourselves more time before the deadline to make final touches to our production, this includes adding more transitions both video and audio, applying filters perhaps, as well as adding a title and credits scene to our film. Another benefit of having more time would be being able to render in a higher quality, our final film was rendered in 480p and would have been even better if rendered in 1080p, however I didn’t think this too much of a problem as we had filmed with a high quality camera.  

To conclude, although we faced problems and imperfection along the way, this was to be expected with any filmmaking process especially for first year students, and so I was really pleased with the final result – we worked well as a team and achieved all that we set out to do. It had a variety of different camera shots, we put careful thought into the mise-en-scene of every frame and we carried through the desired aesthetic we wished for in order to meet the conventions of the two themes of our film – romance and horror, this further was shown with our use of soundtrack. This film was generally a success receiving high praise from friends and family, as well as accumulating over 400 views on YouTube in just 2 days. Overall it was a rewarding and enjoyable experience and I have learnt a lot to consider for future filmmaking tasks.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'With close reference to two scenes from 'Pan's Labyrinth', explore how cinematography and mise-en-scène create meaning.'

' P an’s L abyrinth ' is one of the most profound contemporary films. Comprising so many symbols, themes and ideas, it presents a genuine masterpiece bequeathed to the film industry by a magnificent Mexican director, Guillermo del  Toro.  Released  in 2006, it was  critica lly  lauded with 3 Academy Award wins in 2007 for Best Makeup, Art Direction and Cinematography. It is widely regarded as Del Toro's definitive film.      A key scene in the film is when Ofelia meets the Faun, as it is the beginning of her fantasy adventures and he gives her the book which inspires her to  complete  all the tasks that he sets. The scene  begins  when  the fairy  leads  Ofelia to the Labyrinth. The fairy itself changes its form to what Ofelia imagines a fairy  should look like – according to her story books. This suggests that the whole world that Ofelia is about to enter is based upon her own imaginations and poses the question of what is real and what is not. The lighting of

How far does Blade Runner reflect the auteur signature features of Riddley Scott?

Riddley Scott is seen by many as a filmmaker whose individual style and complete control over all elements of production gives a film its personal and unique stamp – this is known as an auteur. Scott is known for his notable films such as 'Alien' (1979), 'Gladiator' (2000), 'Prometheus' (2012), and of course 'Blade Runner' (1982). One element of Scott's films that contributes to the auteur theory is his narratives are often stories of Horror, Science Fiction/Fantasy, or historical events. 'Blade Runner' is undoubtable a Science Fiction/Fantasy film but interestingly further includes conventions of Horror as well. All his films center around a pivotal event, mostly on a short timeline, that surround escaping or finding something. For 'Alien', it's escaping the alien planet and the Xenomorph, in 'Gladiator', it's escaping slavery and avenging his family and 'Blade Runner' follows the narrative pattern by trackin
  Review  'Lolita'  (1997) Arguab ly  one of  the most  controversial  films of its decade, Adrian Lyne's 'Lolita' is a captivating adaptation of the highly acclaimed  Vladimir Nabokov's  1955 novel of the same title. Comparing Lyne's adaptation to the earlier Stanley Kubrick's  'Lolita'  of   1962, I was rather  surprised  to much prefer Lyne's take on the story.   C onsidering how sexual a lot of Stanley Kubrick's films are, his version of Lolita is restrained in the sexual aspects of the story, failing to go where its story begs for it to go to. It fades to black in key sequences, and lets the audience imagine what is happening between Professor Humbert and Lolita. I feel as though  director Adrian Lyne decided  he wanted  to do another take on Nabokov’s novel, taking the detail further and really showcasing the powerful dynamic between the characters, and allowing the audience to feel moved by the  unsett ling   storyline  of